The Drought's the Government's Fault! (We Should Have Known!)
In yesterday's Sun Herald ...
One of the jokes in Sydney is that we get all these torrential downpours that flood basements and wash tonnes of rubbish into the harbour, and the next day we hear on the radio that dam levels haven't budged a jot.
Miranda Divine asked the question. It's a difficult one to answer, but I'll have a stab. Maybe it's raining in Sydney and not over the dam catchments?
"No!" says Miranda.
The answer is political. The drought has been a perfect opportunity for the Government to excuse its failure to invest in infrastructure by blaming external factors outside its control.
So Bob Carr's been telling the weather gods to hold the rain for political purposes! (Sound of hand slapping forehead.) We should have known!
Miranda drags up the old solution to Sydney's water shortage. We need another dam.
Call me simple, but if it's not raining enough to fill one dam, then there's not going to be enough water to fill an adjacent one at the same time. The problem is not a lack of storage, but increasingly long drought periods caused by changing weather patterns due to human induced climate change.
Building a new dam, which would be considerably lower than the existing Warragamba Dam, would require large pumps to get the water to consumers. Pumps = energy use = greenhouse gas = climate change = longer drought periods = (in Miranda's view) more water storage = another dam = .... you get the picture.
The answer to Sydney's water shortage is more efficient use of the resource through measures such as realistic pricing, use of urban runoff, and recycling.
And a final thought; I wonder if Miranda would give up the idea of a dam if some traditional owners said it was against their beliefs to interfere with the river?
2 Comments
Leave a comment
Post a comment
Note! This site runs a spam filter which, among other things, looks out for certain words which it uses to guess whether the post is junk. For this reason, avoid using words related to gambling, ie, poker, roulette, casino etc, or names of certain sexual performance enhancing drugs. Posts that contain these words are automatically junked.
It may also moderate comments that contain more than two URLs, including your web page URL.
If you get a message that your comment has been moderated, and it hasn't materialised within a day or so, please email me so I can retrieve it.


Well from out here it's good to see something shaking people out of their complacency over water and I so agree - a new dam is no answer atall. Where for gawd's sake. We run our whole house on untreated and unfiltered rainwater and have for years - and we never get sick and it tastes so much better too. What we catch on our roof lasts us well except in extreme drought times and then we reluctantly top up with as little town water as we can manage.
The answer lies in R&D into storage systems and effective water use. Space under houses would make such a great reservoir location and act as a cooling bank too.
Trouble is - until water is charged at a realistic rate people will still hose their driveways and take 30 minute showers and act surprised when there is a shortage - and demand dams! And as we have to pay for 400Ml per annum in our rates, that amount will go on our garden. Crazy.
Yep, to many people it's a God given right that they be allowed use resources with no thought to the consequences.