Keeping Young Drivers Alive

| | Comments (2)

After a spate of high publicity fatalities involving young drivers in spectacular crashes, the NSW government has released a discussion paper on ways to curb the carnage.

As the father of three kids who will one day get their licence, I have a close personal interest in the subject.

I'm lucky to have survived my first three years of driving. It was before the introduction of RBT, and the combination of booze, speed and inexperience should have been fatal. I put my survival down to a technical interest in how cars work and perform; experimentation that taught me, by trial and error, the limits of the vehicles I drove; and lashings of luck.

I don't want my kids emulating their father.

It seems teenagers' feelings of invincibility haven't changed much. For every death there must be hundreds of lesser accidents and thousands of near misses. The trick is getting young drivers to survive that first three years of holding a licence.

The government's in the difficult position of trying to curtail the road toll by restricting young drivers, while not being too draconian. They're suggesting the following:

  1. Increasing the age of getting a licence to 18;
  2. Prohibiting young drivers from driving at night;
  3. Restricting the number of passengers allowed to travel with a young driver;
  4. Prohibiting young people from driving high powered vehicles;
  5. Increasing the training required to obtain a licence.

While these measure have merit, to be effective they need to be enforceable. It's not hard to see measures to restrict hours of driving and passenger numbers being routinely flouted.

Restricting young drivers' access to powerful vehicles appeals to the Daily Telegraph, but many more young drivers are killed in the bog standard family sedan than in high performance vehicles.

The only measure likely to make any significant difference to the road toll is the last in the list, increased driver training. And I'm not talking about passive defensive driver training, although that has an important role to play, but advanced training that teaches a driver to appreciate the limits of their vehicle, and methods to get them out of trouble if those limits are exceeded.

Advanced driver training is resisted by the authorities, who argue that it encourages young drivers to push the limits in general driving. Of course, some will, but they're going to anyway, trained or not. I'd prefer my kids to have some advanced driver skills when they push the limits, as they inevitably will.


Postscript: This issue has a couple of interesting sub-plots besides the issue of the safety of young drivers.

One is the role of the media, in this case The Daily Telegraph, running an overt campaign to force the government into action. It was over the top, with the front page devoted to the subject several days in a row.

The other is how that dill Howard Scruby always manages to get his name in the paper when road safety issues are raised.

I'll leave these to more qualified writers to explore.

2 Comments

SuePB said:

There's an interesting addition to this debate.
According to a recent research, it is now believed that frontal lobe development in young people may not be complete till they are 25 - and it is latest in boys. The frontal lobes are responsible for the rational thinking and responsible behaviour so it seems that people of P plate age and boys in particular are really not mentally equipped to drive cars! The answer could be to prevent boys from driving until they are a couple of years older but imagine the outcry if the girls are legal 2 years earlier. Would young male egos handle it? - Of course not!!

Being the mother of a P plate daughter - it's terrifying. She nearly rolled a Landcruiser on a dirt road the other day - all through inexperience - and she's not a silly driver on the whole. Letting them go and keeping them safe is the parental paradox.

tony said:

I'm aware of those findings, too. Increasing the age of gaining a licence would be sensible in light of the research.

I think it would be politically impossible to increase the driving age to over 18.

Leave a comment

Post a comment

Note! This site runs a spam filter which, among other things, looks out for certain words which it uses to guess whether the post is junk. For this reason, avoid using words related to gambling, ie, poker, roulette, casino etc, or names of certain sexual performance enhancing drugs. Posts that contain these words are automatically junked.

It may also moderate comments that contain more than two URLs, including your web page URL.

If you get a message that your comment has been moderated, and it hasn't materialised within a day or so, please email me so I can retrieve it.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by tony published on November 30, 2004 10:54 PM.

Imposing Lasting Democracy was the previous entry in this blog.

Caring Private School Plays 'Blame the Victim' is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Site Counter

Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en

Banner Designed By:

darlinggraphics.com - for all your styling needs

Porcine Aviator: